Category: religion

Hellfire and Damnation

Iglesia de Santa María de Betancuria, Fuerteventura

I took this picture in the Iglesia de Santa María de Betancuria, on the island of Fuerteventura. 

Salvation awaits with the saints in Heaven, while the beasts of hell devour the sinners. The priests reach out to the poor souls, waist-deep in the fires of purgatory. They, and they alone, have the power of earthly redemption.

This picture has a single purpose: to terrify.

We cannot imagine the horror pictures like this invoked in the medieval mind. Every visitor to the church would be faced with this image of terror, hellfire, and eternal damnation.

Unbelievably wicked.

Go out into the world in peace

I went to a very sad funeral last week. A bishop is a family friend and he took the service.

He ended with the following benediction:

Go out into the world in peace, have courage.
Hold onto what is good.
Return no one evil for evil.
Strengthen the faint-hearted.
Support the weak, help the suffering.
Honour all people.
Love and serve the Lord,
Rejoicing in the love of God,
The communion of the Holy Spirit
Be with your all, now and forever.
Amen.

As I heard these words I found myself thinking, ‘I couldn’t agree more’. I am not a Christian and have no faith, but instinctively agree with the sentiments and philosophy behind those words.

If I were to articulate my life philosophy, there would be no better way of doing so than saying, “Go out into the world in peace, have courage. Hold onto what is good. Return no one evil for evil. Strengthen the faint-hearted. Support the weak, help the suffering. Honour all people.“.

I have always believed in the wisdom and values of the Christian faith and, despite my atheism, have lived according to Christian principles. I see them as universal values, rather than exclusively Christian ideals.

I don’t do God.

But, I do do the simple, lasting values of Christianity.

Who doesn’t ?

The Bible in txt msg….

Get this…. the Australian Bible Society have claimed to be the first to translate all 31,173 verses of the Bible into text message speak. I mean Jesus, what are they thinking ? That is the most bizarre thing ever. Why ?

Looks suspiciously like a misguided attempt to get in wiv the yoof. There’s a slight creepy element to this, it has to be said. I’m always a bit wary when the god squad try to get too close to children.

Anyway, here’s that famous bit from the Sermon on the Mount in txt (via):

Blessed R d pOr n spirit,
4 thRz iz d kingdom of heavN.
Blessed R thOs hu mourn,
4 dey shaL b comforted.

Blessed R d meek,
4 dey shaL inherit d erth.
Blessed R thOs hu hunger & thirst 4 righteousness,
4 dey shaL b fiLD.
Blessed R d merciful,
4 dey shaL obtain mercy.

Blessed R d pure n hart,
4 dey shaL c God.
Blessed R d peacemakers,
4 dey shaL b caLd sons of God.
Blessed R thOs hu R persecuted 4 righteousness sake,
4 thRz iz d kingdom of heavN.

Wkd m8 !

Makes Monty Python’s Sermon on the Mount sketch in the Life of Brian seem rather normal. Blessed are the cheesemakers….

That Funeral…

Just watched the highlights of the Pope’s funeral on TV.

What an occasion.

A global event watched by people from all over the world.

From as far afield as Mexico, The Philippines, China and Africa people stopped what they were doing to watch the funeral of a much revered pope.

The service did not let them down. It was a ceremony of high Catholic ritual and ornamentation with the full finery of the Church hierarchy on display. The cardinals were in flaming red, the mourners and pilgrims in black and priests and nuns in white flowing robes. It was a day of colour, celebration and mourning.

It’s a great tribute to John Paul II that so many world leaders attended in person. They ranged from George Bush to President Khatami of Iran. There were kings, queens, presidents, chiefs, princes, sheiks, sultans, imams, rabbis, Hindu holy men, Sikhs, protestants of all denominations, African bishops, Buddhists and Jains.

Arranging the seating must have been a diplomatic nightmare. Who sits next to who ? George Bush at times looked impatient and confused. Prince Charles had an awkward handshake with Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe and rumours were eventually denied that the Presidents of Iran and Israel actually exchanged words.

My favourite moment was President Jacques Chirac of France greeting Condolezza Rice. So French. So Chirac ! Seems that even in death, John Paul II was promoting international dialogue.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a full Catholic mass before. Sure was interesting to watch how it’s done. Lots of readings, blessings, signs of the cross, singing, reciting, incense, bells, bowing, kneeling and processing. They even seemed to pause for a snack half way through.

John Paul II was a Polish Pope and was revered as a saviour of the Polish nation. They loved him and came to Rome in their hundreds of thousands to pay their respects. At times the ceremony seemed more like a Polish backpacker celebration that a pontiff’s funeral.

One of John Paul II’s great strengths was young people identified with him. He toured the world drawing adoring crowds wherever he went.

What was striking was the depth of feeling and human response to his death. It touched millions. This was no ordinary Pope. People seemed to be reacting to the person, not necessarily his position. He was a human figure and undoubtedly a moral man.

As an atheist, the religious ceremony was no more than historic ritual, but the man was special. John Paul II will probably go down as one of the greats.

Having said that, his papacy wasn’t without it’s controversies and dilemmas. Not least, child abuse and a refusal to accept contraception in the face of AIDS. Both of which are scandalous and should seriously undermine the moral authority of the Church. In my view, it is wickedly immoral for priests to abuse children and for a religious institution to condemn millions to death out of a dogmatic refusal to accept the need for contraception. That is an abomination.

Otherwise, the Catholic Church has to face up to a slump in attendance, growing secularisation in the west and the fallout from the child abuse scandal and cover-up. On top of that, the Church has to confront serious issues like contraception and HIV/AIDS, attitudes to abortion and women priests, homosexuality and celibate clergy. Saying No, No, No is not a responsible answer. Relations with Islam, especially in Africa, will also need to be addressed.

These issues won’t go away and will become more and more acute as time goes on. Liberal and conservative wings will dig in on either side of the issues (as they always do) and doctrinal splits may be inevitable as with the Anglican Church over gay clergy.

Whatever happens, the next Pope has a full in-tray. One of the indicators of how the Catholic Church will address these issues is whether the Cardinals choose a conservative or a liberal as the next Pope.

One to watch…

Christmas cheer….

Does it bother you that Christmas is losing its religious meaning ? Does it matter the festive season is becoming just another super-charged shopping spree. An excuse to shop until you drop, drink to excess and make merry.

Aren’t we, after all, supposed to be celebrating the birth of a man who preached forgiveness, love and tolerance and founded a major world religion ? Shouldn’t we therefore pay him and his teachings a bit more attention ? Or doesn’t the Jesus bit really matter anymore… Think about it, on an average Christmas day how many times does Jesus Christ come up in conversation ?

Well, other cultures and faiths experience similar anxieties over their religious festivals being taken over by senseless consumerism. Haaretz, over in Israel, bemoans how Hanukkah, the Jewish Festival of Lights, is turning into an out and out shopping fest…

Is this more to do with our culture’s relentless appetite for shopping and consumption or are we genuinely leaving the old religious festivals and values behind as we redefine the meaning of cultural celebration and holidays… ? I dunno, but I think we would be missing something important if we forgot why we were having the party…

The best celebrations mix cultural meaning and reflection in with the festivities. The Jewish faith seems to have perfected this combination over the centuries. Perhaps all cultures and faiths can learn something important from them at this time of year.

The will to disbelieve….

Saw Jonathan Miller’s A Brief History of Disbelief last night on BBC4.

Fantastic !

Miller discussed and investigated the philosophical basis and long history of atheism and disbelief.

He, as I am, is a secure atheist who finds belief in a God an unfathomable state of mind. His exploration of the arguments for atheism and his conversations with philosophers, historians and thinkers were fascinating and very illuminating.

He reviewed the Greek philosophers and their thoughts on the existence of God. Here is a question posed by Epicurus 400 years before the birth of Christ. No one has yet come up with a satisfactory answer…

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.

Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.

Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?

Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?

Either God wants to abolish evil, and cannot; Or he can, but does not want to; Or he cannot and does not want to. If he wants to, but cannot, he is impotent. If he can, but does not want to, he is wicked. But, if God both can and wants to abolish evil, then how come evil is in the world ?

Food for thought…

Devout Sceptics

I was listening to Radio 4’s Devout Sceptics again and tuned into Professor Robert Winston talking about Judaism.

Professor Winston is a remarkable man and he describes his relationship with his Orthodox Jewish roots and how it has influenced him. I was fascinated in his account of Judaism and the way of life that his faith encourages.

I don’t know much about the Jewish faith. But it’s a belief system that interests me. I am especially impressed by the fact that Judaism teaches that the righteous of all faiths will inherit the earth. That’s a very interesting and mature religious concept. Also, there is no absolute truth in Judaism and this lack of certainty is refreshing in a religious faith.

The BBC, being totally amazing, has put the entire interview online. If you have a spare moment just listen to it….

today's weather...

Gay marriage

Gay marriage is all over the media and it’s got some people all worked up.

So, same-sex couples may actually want to certify their partnerships. Why is that such a big deal ? Surely, it’s a natural progression and should be welcomed and encouraged.

Bush is threatening a constitutional amendment and the Church are going through a series of reactionary spasms, ranging from fire and brimstone to anguished hand-wringing.

‘Love thy neighbour’ is the first thing Christians forget when homosexuality comes up…

The interesting thing is the Bible, and indeed most major religions, clearly say ‘no’ to homosexuality.

For various historical reasons, they conclude it is immoral and should not be practised. If you take the Bible literally, then that is an inescapable fact.

Leviticus 18:22

Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

Leviticus 20:13
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

King James Bible

The Book of Leviticus in the Bible is clear that homosexuality is an ‘abomination’ and Islam is equally vehement in its opposition.

However, society is starting to understand and accept same-sex relationships. A more pragmatic and tolerant attitude is emerging.

We’re moving on now, leaving medieval doctrines and superstitious belief systems behind.

Science, biology, genetics and more inclusive philosophies have taken the place of religious dogma in informing us about ourselves and why we are here. We no longer need the Church’s outdated prescriptions and prohibitions.

Christianity has been obsessed with sex and it’s regulation for centuries. Meddling in people’s personal lives and producing petty rules to ensure compliance.

Strange really, Jesus never mentions homosexuality. Not once. Not even in passing. In fact, he rarely talks about sex.

Christianity has also been plagued by endless splits and schisms. One branch believes this, another that… Who can count the number of Christian denominations in existence ?

Disagreement on the meaning of Scripture is endemic. Let’s face it, there are four conflicting accounts of the life of Christ in the New Testament. Even the Scriptures don’t agree with each other !

Hardly a strong basis for absolute doctrine. But that is Christianity’s strength, it evolves and adapts as society changes.

Like contraception, divorce and abortion – things are a changing ! Will religious dogma evolve, as it always has in the past (think Galileo !), or will the theocrats be left to bicker over their irrelevant doctrines ?

Clearly, if same-sex couples want to declare the following vow in a public, recognised ceremony; we all should welcome it,

“Do you take ___ as your lawful wife/husband, to have and to hold, from this day forward, for better or for worse, for richer or for poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and cherish until death do you part?”

Surely, it’s in all our interests to promote and encourage loving relationships between people, regardless of gender.

It’s a tribute to the institution of marriage that gay people want to share in the commitment, stability and recognition of matrimony.

With skyrocketing divorce rates and more and more people opting not to marry, gay weddings should be welcomed with open arms.


PostScrpt: new research into who wrote the Book of Leviticus and what their original intentions were is usefully summarised in this New York Times article entitled, The Secret History of Leviticus.

It seems the absolute doctrines of the church were interpreted very differently in antiquity and have been revised and edited by subsequent generations of clerics. 

God, the universe and everything…

There is no God.

There never has been and there never will be.

Virgins don’t give birth and the dead cannot be resurrected.

Heaven and hell do not exist.

We should have worked these things out by now.

So, thinking about it, which is more terrifying: That there is a God or there isn’t…

That there is a God. A great all seeing all-knowing creator who made the universe and loves us all. He invisibly watches our every move and bestows eternal salvation on his devotees. Those who reject him, or fail to live according to his wishes are condemned to burn for all eternity.

There will be a final reckoning when God will sit in judgement. The good will live in glory in heaven, the bad will be cast out, into a monstrous hell.

or

That we are totally alone.

The only intelligent life ever to exist anywhere (so far as we know).

Marooned in the cold silence of space.

Life formed through a fantastic combination of random chances and evolutionary accidents.

Perilously perched on a cooling orb of stellar rock propelled around a burning star at exactly the speed and distance to permit life. Unplanned, the children of chance.

So, the meaning of life ?

Depends on which of the above you go for.

If you choose God, then it’s pretty much covered. It’s up to him to decide our purpose. We don’t have to worry too much about meaning, we can happily defer the big questions (and answers) to his celestial plan.

He’s the architect and we are the bricks !

All will be revealed and let’s just hope he’s kind to us on the big day ! (‘God have mercy on our souls’… sound familiar ?)

If you don’t buy the God thing, then it gets a bit more tricky.

There are no Gods, no grand plans, no celestial architects, no blissful after-lives and no eternal damnation.

Life has been assembled by an unfathomable configuration of chances and probabilities. We are moulded over millions of years by an evolutionary process not a God. All we have are the bleak certainties of scientific theory to navigate by.

It’s up to us to make of it what we will…

I go for the second scenario as the most likely. bit bleak huh ? What do you think ?

The Will to Believe

I came across this a while ago and thought it was quite good.

"... we act, taking our life in our hands. 

No one of us ought to issue vetoes to the other, nor should we bandy words of abuse. We ought, on the contrary, delicately and profoundly to respect one another's mental freedom: then only shall we bring about the intellectual republic; then only shall we have that spirit of inner tolerance without which all our outer tolerance is soulless, and which is empiricism's glory; then only shall we live and let live, in speculative as well as in practical things.

I began by a reference to Fitz-James Stephen; let me end by a quotation from him.

"What do you think of yourself ?

What do you think of the world? ...

These are questions with which all must deal as it seems good to them. They are riddles of the Sphinx, and in some way or other we must deal with them....

In all important transactions of life we have to take a leap in the dark. . . If we decide to leave the riddles unanswered, that is a choice; if we waver in our answer, that, too, is a choice: but whatever choice we make, we make it at our peril.

If a man chooses to turn his back altogether on God and the future, no one can prevent him; no one can show beyond reasonable doubt that he is mistaken. If a man thinks otherwise and acts as he thinks, I do not see that any one can prove that he is mistaken. Each must act as he thinks best; and if he is wrong, so much the worse for him.

We stand on a mountain pass in the midst of whirling snow and blinding mist, through which we get glimpses now and then of paths which may be deceptive. If we take the wrong road we shall be dashed to pieces. We do not certainly know whether there is any right one.

What must we do?

'Be strong and of a good courage'.

Act for the best, hope for the best, and take what comes. . . . . If death ends all, we cannot meet death better."

- extract from, 'The Will to Believe' by William James.

It’s an interesting idea(l)…